Ian Lurie // Dec 27 2007
Be very, very careful when you read claims by bloggers and SEO ‘professionals’ that fresh content no longer matters.
Content matters. A lot. Ignoring it will doom your efforts to get a high ranking, 99% of the time.
I mean text content, by the way – text that you can cut-and-paste into a word processor. Search engines can’t read images, they can’t watch video, and they don’t listen to podcasts.
Darren over at Problogger wrote “frequently updated content isn’t quite as important a factor as other elements of SEO”. While he may have been right about the one site discussed (more on that below), you need to take his statement with several thousand grains of salt.
Here’s proof, if you need it: One of our clients consistently ranked #1-4 for a very competitive phrase. They achieved that ranking by adding a keyword-rich and well-written article to their site 3 times per week. Then, in July of 2007, they stopped writing.
Their rankings remained OK for about 2 months. They even went up in September.
That created a false sense of security. The client assumed that new content was no longer a factor for rankings.
Unless you’re CNN.com, there’s probably a delay of days (or even weeks) between posting new content and any lift in the search engine rankings.
Here’s the proof:
In September, the client’s rankings plunged. Nothing helped.
We started writing 3 articles per week again. For 6 weeks, nothing happened. Then, a Christmas miracle: Their site started popping back into the top 4:
Content isn’t the only factor in search engine rankings. But it’s the most important. Without it, search engines can’t easily determine why your site matters.
Yep, everyone talks about links, link baiting, link happiness, link juice, link love and every other form of link joy. Links are important.
But guess what? Getting lots of links requires that people you don’t know link to you. If you think that your shiny new online store is going to collect 4000 links overnight, you’re kidding yourself. Are you really so unique, so unusual, that reputable, relevant sites are going to leap at the chance to point you out?
I’m not being nasty here – if you’re following some internet marketing strategy, be it Conversation Marketing or something else, your site certainly has value.
I am being realistic, though. New sites spring up every minute. If you want links – more of them than your competitors – you’re going to have to work hard, over a long period.
While you’re waiting, why not write some great content?
Here’s how you can get that #1 ranking:
Yes, you’ll still need links. But your content strategy will attract links at the same time that it increases your site’s relevance.
Darren’s statement referred to Weblogs, Inc. site digitalphotography.weblogsinc.com. Weblogs is an enormous network of blogs, including one of the top 5 blogs on the internet, Engadget.
His complaint: Digital Photography remained in the top 10 even though it hadn’t been updated in months.
This site’s one of the few exceptions you’ll find: It has 600,000 incoming links. That’s over 10x most of its competitors. The site only has 600 pages of content. But most competitors have only 2-3x that.
So, in this case, the sheer volume of links outweighs the lack of content. There are other factors, too, but you get the idea: Digital Photography just steamrolled the rankings.
If you think you can get 600,000 incoming links, go for it.
Otherwise, keep writing. It’s your one sure ticket to a good search ranking.
Ian Lurie is founder and CEO of Portent Inc., an internet marketing agency that has provided internet marketing, including PPC, SEO, social and analytics services, since 1995. Read More