With all the talk about enhanced campaigns results in the last week—on PPC Hero, most notably—we were curious to see how they would fly with a well-known brand, both from a smartphone and tablet perspective.
A quick enhanced campaigns case study
- Chose 1 brand campaign, 1 non-brand campaign
- Established baseline of performance for 2 days with legacy device-specific versions of those 2 campaigns
- Migrated to enhanced campaigns for 2 days
- Used Google’s suggested mobile bid modifier
- Used same keyword lists for enhanced and legacy
- Set same keyword-level bids for enhanced and legacy
- Wrote same ad texts for both enhanced and legacy
- Brand smartphone CPCs fell by 11%—Good.
- Non-branded smartphone CPCs fell by 16%—Nice!
- Brand tablet CPCs rose by 39%—ZOMGWTFBBQ?!
- Non-branded tablet CPCs rose by 9%—I can live with that.
- This is just one vertical—competition varies by industry, so that may have factored in.
- I didn’t increase the budget in my non-brand enhanced campaign—this client allows us to spend unlimited amounts on brand, but has CPA expectations for non-brand that we couldn’t risk upsetting.
- Because of how recently this was announced, I didn’t have time to do same days of the week for this test, but that probably would’ve affected CTR more than CPC, if anything.
Early impressions of AdWords enhanced campaigns
Enhanced campaigns will legitimately help folks interested in running ads on smartphones, even with Google’s out-of-the-box recommendations for the bid modifier.
That’ll make it really, really easy for small businesses to adopt a mobile advertising strategy.
But, this appears to really ream all of us who got great performance with tablet-specific campaigns.
The big brands and power users will really feel this tablet CPC increase both over time and in the short term with literally no average ad position benefit that I could see.
So, tell me: Are you guys seeing the same thing?