A new SEO factor: QualityRank
Ian Lurie Jun 8 2011
Ooh! Ooh! Did you see that?! I just made up a new term! I, Ian Lurie, can now put my stamp on the industry. QualityRank. It has a nice ring to it, yes? By tomorrow 10 conferences will invite me to keynote.
Google has talked about ‘quality user experience’ and ‘quality content’ for a long time. But recent algorithm updates really seem to be moving them in this direction. You can read the writing of lots of other smart SEOs on the subject—don’t take my word for it.
Google is literally adding a new factor to rankings: Site quality. They’ve hinted and inched towards it for years, but now it’s here: QualityRank is going to rule SEO for a while.
That’s the last time I’ll use ‘QualityRank’, I promise. Damn. I used it again. OK, NOW I’m done.
Google published More guidance on building high-quality sites back in early May.
Google spills the beans
In it, they write:
”…if you want to step into Google’s mindset, the questions below provide some guidance on how we’ve been looking at the issue…”
And the questions are an easy look at Google’s mindset. The high points:
Question: Would you trust the information in this article?
Translation: Are you full of crap? Are you writing an article about cancer treatments when you have zero knowledge on the subject? If you used other web sites as a guide, you might be screwed, ‘cause they don’t know any more than you do.
Question: Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
Translation: Running your own content farm may not work all that well. Yeah, I know, eHow still lives, somehow. You’re not eHow. So get real writers, and write real articles.
Question: Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
Translation: Hiring 40 people on Mechanical Turk to each write a new version of your article isn’t going to work. You have to produce truly unique content. Or, try your hand at out-coding Google’s best language processing engineers. It’ll be FUN!
Question: Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
Translation: This one is really interesting. Things that make me keep my credit card in my wallet include broken image links, convoluted checkout processes and, biggest of all, broken SSL on carts or expired security certificates. You’ve seen ‘em before—errors like this:
Check your site for these errors and fix ‘em. Google can almost certainly sniff out these kinds of things, and it can hurt your site quality.
A few more of my favorites:
Question: Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
Translation: Use a dictionary. Check your facts. Learn to write gooder. If I, Ian Lurie, mediocre programmer, can write a script that checks for verbs and nouns in sentences, you can bet that Google goes quite a bit farther.
Question: Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
Translation: Are you a known quantity? This one kind of pisses me off, actually. Google is once again favoring brands and existing content over new stuff. While QDF may mitigate that somewhat, this is still a major problem in search. If merely existing builds authority, how does great new content climb into the rankings?
Question: Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
Translation: If you’re writing in the SEO industry, the translation is: Are you regurgitating the same useless crap 500 other SEO ‘gurus’ have spouted? Cough. Sorry. I love this one. I wish they’d apply it at conferences and cause offenders to spontaneously combust. Just for a second. We’d put ‘em out after that. I swear.
There are a 23 questions in all in the Google post. You should read them all, print them, and then ask yourself each one of them every time you ponder SEO content strategy. Also, really read the Google Webmaster Guidelines, and then ruthlessly apply them to your own site.
I’m not a Google fanboy. Google’s a profit-seeking enterprise. They have their own interests at heart. But they’re a tiger, and you’ve, at best, got them by the tail. Hang on.
It’s good for you
Conveniently, Google’s guidelines lead to a pretty nice site. So follow their recommendations and you’ll have a better product, even if your rankings don’t improve a bit.
Is there more you can do? Of course. Link acquisition, social media marketing and other SEO techniques will give you a boost. But first, do no harm. Find problems, fix ‘em and get in line with what Google’s asking.
- How (not) to tell someone you can’t afford it
- Google +1: NOT the internet marketing messiah
- Inconceivable! 4 signs your project’s in big trouble.
- Infographic: The internet marketing planner
- Analytics plus SEO equals content
- Follow me on Twitter
- The Real World Unscary Guide to SEO Copywriting
- The PPC ebook You Gotta Buy
CEO & Founder
Ian Lurie is CEO and founder of Portent and the EVP of Marketing Services at Clearlink. He's been a digital marketer since the days of AOL and Compuserve (25 years, if you're counting). He's recorded training for Lynda.com, writes regularly for the Portent Blog and has been published on AllThingsD, Smashing Magazine, and TechCrunch.Ian speaks at conferences around the world, including SearchLove, MozCon, Seattle Interactive Conference and ad:Tech. He has published has published several books about business and marketing: One Trick Ponies Get Shot, available on Kindle, The Web Marketing All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies, and Conversation Marketing.Follow him on Twitter at portentint, and on LinkedIn at LinkedIn.com/in/ianlurie. Read More